Moffitt Partners with Rand Simulation for Computational Fluid Dynamics Consulting

Reduce simulation scope, Focus on high-ROI studies, and Protect product launches under compressed timelines.

The New Year is the perfect time to see how “in shape” your simulation organization is and start building that fitness plan.

We often focus on reducing inefficiencies in product development through simulation. Whether it’s speeding up lengthy physical testing, minimizing design rework with strong conceptualization, or ...

Simplifying models, choosing mesh types, and configuring hardware for simulation software all can slow down or speed up the simulation workflow. In this blog post, we’ll walk through these choices.

Candidates that have spent significant time in product development (whether design, simulation, physical validation or a combination thereof) bring a wealth of knowledge to a simulation team.

While having standard work procedures for all simulations would be the ideal scenario, every company’s product development cycle and product portfolio has a high degree of variability.

To be best-in-class for product development, a company needs to keep challenging themselves, their staff, and their product to grow and remain competitive. Relying too extensively on tribal knowledge

Learn about when and why you would choose a steady state or transient simulation.

By utilizing Corvid HPC for Ansys Software, your team can use multicore computers to perform a higher volume of simulations with quicker results. Your simulations can be larger and more complicated.

Rand Simulation will be discussing simulation’s impact on a company with particular emphasis on driving business value through its adoption.

You have been tasked with developing a new product. It is a clean-sheet design with a reasonably large budget and enough resources to launch a robust, best-in-class product.